College Basketball Picks for Wednesday, December 16, 2026
Our pick and win probability for every game, from our own rankings, common opponents and efficiency.
- Our picks, 2026–27
- 99–1884.6%
- Last 7 days
- 99–1884.6%
- When 70%+ sure
- 77–989.5%
All 53 games on December 16
times ET12:00 AM ET
Ecclesianon-D1
AR-Pine Bluff0–0No pick vs non-D1 teams
12:00 PM ET
Reinhardtnon-D1
133Jax State1–0No pick vs non-D1 teams
12:00 PM ET
Biblical Studnon-D1
146Rice1–0No pick vs non-D1 teams
6:00 PM ETProj. 72–78
171Norfolk St1–032%
204Columbia0–168%RCECompare →
6:00 PM ET
Fishernon-D1
165UMass Lowell1–0No pick vs non-D1 teams
6:00 PM ETProj. 69–80
Alabama St0–016%
170West Florida1–084%RCECompare →
6:00 PM ETProj. 68–91
296West Georgia0–12%
36Georgia1–098%RCECompare →
6:30 PM ETProj. 64–75
268Saint Peter's0–115%
Rutgers0–085%RCECompare →
6:30 PM ET
TN Wesleyannon-D1
32Furman1–0No pick vs non-D1 teams
6:30 PM ETProj. 70–76
20Dartmouth1–031%
95Temple1–069%RCECompare →
6:30 PM ETProj. 70–82
288UT Martin0–112%
78Penn State1–088%RCECompare →
6:30 PM ETProj. 84–74
1Akron1–083%
195Buffalo0–117%RCECompare →
6:30 PM ETProj. 68–83
148Sacred Heart1–07%
35Georgetown1–093%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 61–89
185Alcorn St0–16%
241Miami0–194%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 88–85
Alabama0–061%
89South Florida1–039%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 77–80
257Oakland0–140%
280Toledo0–160%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ET
Mid Atl Chrstnnon-D1
Hampton0–0No pick vs non-D1 teams
7:00 PM ET
Toccoa Fallsnon-D1
279The Citadel0–1No pick vs non-D1 teams
7:00 PM ETProj. 72–85
274Stetson0–110%
114Wright St1–090%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ET
287UNC Asheville0–1
Queensnon-D1No pick vs non-D1 teams
7:00 PM ETProj. 58–79
N Arizona0–03%
111West Virginia1–097%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 78–89
126FIU1–015%
100UCF1–085%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 75–82
136Longwood1–023%
28Elon1–077%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 61–77
238MD Eastern0–17%
Saint Joseph's0–093%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 71–79
74Old Dominion1–028%
51Marshall1–072%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 71–78
214Georgia St0–129%
222James Madison0–171%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 72–78
202Coastal0–127%
37GA Southern1–073%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 85–84
199Charleston So0–154%
North Florida0–046%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 69–79
182UAlbany1–022%
273St Bonaventure0–178%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 79–77
56Miami OH1–054%
8Bowling Green1–046%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 73–70
72Ohio1–066%
189Ball State0–134%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 60–83
197Canisius0–12%
94Syracuse1–098%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 67–86
132Jacksonville1–04%
31Florida St1–096%RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 68–87
271SC Upstate0–13%
10Butler1–097%RCECompare →
7:30 PM ETProj. 69–80
150SC State1–022%
200Chattanooga0–178%RCECompare →
7:30 PM ETProj. 73–81
230Lipscomb0–121%
112Western KY1–079%RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 60–85
246Morehead St0–11%
Tennessee0–099%RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 71–75
300Winthrop0–135%
142North Texas1–065%RCECompare →
8:00 PM ET
190Bellarmine0–1
S Indiananon-D1No pick vs non-D1 teams
8:00 PM ETProj. 58–78
239Mercyhurst0–13%
70Northwestern1–097%RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 68–90
260Oral Roberts0–12%
73Oklahoma St1–098%RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 69–75
285UL Monroe0–131%
234Louisiana0–169%RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 73–79
270South Alabama0–124%
4Arkansas St1–076%RCECompare →
8:30 PM ETProj. 71–69
85San Francisco1–055%
97Texas St1–045%RCECompare →
8:30 PM ETProj. 63–83
278Texas Southern0–13%
59Minnesota1–097%RCECompare →
8:30 PM ETProj. 69–70
47Louisiana Tech1–052%
282Troy0–148%RCECompare →
9:00 PM ETProj. 73–85
55Memphis1–018%
96Texas1–082%RCECompare →
9:00 PM ETProj. 65–84
233Long Island0–14%
48Louisville1–096%RCECompare →
9:00 PM ET
UT Prmian Basnnon-D1
289UTEP0–1No pick vs non-D1 teams
9:00 PM ET
CO Christiannon-D1
205Denver0–1No pick vs non-D1 teams
9:00 PM ETProj. 72–78
173Utah Valley1–028%
Boise St0–072%RCECompare →
9:00 PM ETProj. 70–78
144Portland1–020%
105Utah1–080%RCECompare →
10:30 PM ETProj. 68–83
272Southern0–18%
76Oregon1–092%RCECompare →
Small numbers beside teams are our rankings, not the AP poll. R, C and E show whether our rankings, common opponents and efficiency agree with the pick.