PicksRecon About

College Basketball Picks for Thursday, January 7, 2027

Our pick and win probability for every game, from our own rankings, common opponents and efficiency.

Our picks, 2026–27
126–2086.3%
Last 7 days
126–2086.3%
When 70%+ sure
102–1190.3%

All 50 games on January 7

times ET
6:00 PM ETProj. 71–70
341UMBC0–148%
81New Hampshire1–052%
RCECompare →
6:00 PM ETProj. 64–68
300NJIT0–133%
288Maine0–167%
RCECompare →
6:00 PM ETProj. 71–71
149Charleston1–046%
252Drexel0–154%
RCECompare →
6:30 PM ETProj. 70–74
27Bryant1–043%
221UAlbany1–057%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 78–80
112Tulane1–036%
40East Carolina1–064%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 72–84
29Charlotte1–012%
101South Florida1–088%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 68–75
200UMass Lowell1–022%
345Vermont0–178%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 75–80
202UNC Greensboro1–029%
244Chattanooga0–171%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 72–73
281Lipscomb0–242%
161Jacksonville1–058%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 78–84
231Bellarmine0–124%
84North Florida1–076%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 77–71
203UNC Wilmington1–069%
NC A&T0–031%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 78–78
43Elon1–054%
240Campbell0–146%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 65–74
262Hampton0–119%
296Monmouth0–181%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 86–82
216William & Mary1–056%
306Northeastern0–144%
RCECompare →
7:00 PM ETProj. 69–68
157Hofstra1–048%
337Towson0–152%
RCECompare →
7:30 PM ETProj. 79–79
1N Kentucky2–058%
155Green Bay1–042%
RCECompare →
7:30 PM ETProj. 87–76
67Marshall1–087%
199UL Monroe1–113%
RCECompare →
7:30 PM ETProj. 69–74
271James Madison0–126%
63Louisiana Tech1–074%
RCECompare →
7:30 PM ETProj. 73–82
207VMI1–019%
192Tennessee Tech1–181%
RCECompare →
7:30 PM ETProj. 72–78
220New Mexico St1–025%
126Western KY1–075%
RCECompare →
7:30 PM ETProj. 76–78
324Sam Houston0–138%
167MTSU1–062%
RCECompare →
7:45 PM ETProj. 68–73
254E Illinois0–128%
298Morehead St0–172%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 87–72
193Tulsa1–081%
344UTSA0–119%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 76–76
317Purdue FW0–144%
295Milwaukee0–256%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 80–79
169Montana1–148%
349Weber St0–152%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 68–66
9Old Dominion2–064%
285Louisiana0–136%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 74–77
51GA Southern1–049%
327South Alabama0–151%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 71–76
247Coastal0–129%
185Southern Miss1–071%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 69–72
6App State2–037%
20Arkansas St1–063%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 76–68
100S Dakota St1–080%
272Kansas City0–120%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 81–79
183South Dakota1–150%
313Oral Roberts0–150%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 75–83
171N Dakota St1–121%
103St Thomas1–079%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 71–79
305North Dakota0–120%
219Omaha1–080%
RCECompare →
8:00 PM ETProj. 69–76
150Delaware1–023%
168Missouri St1–077%
RCECompare →
8:30 PM ETProj. 82–78
173N Colorado1–056%
186Southern Utah1–044%
RCECompare →
8:30 PM ETProj. 67–81
352W Illinois0–110%
332Tennessee St0–190%
RCECompare →
8:30 PM ET
Lindenwoodnon-D1
S Indiananon-D1
No pick vs non-D1 teams
9:00 PM ETProj. 76–83
246Cleveland St0–123%
308N Illinois0–177%
RCECompare →
9:00 PM ETProj. 76–83
237Fullerton0–122%
197Santa Barbara1–078%
RCECompare →
9:00 PM ETProj. 76–72
177Portland St1–054%
206Utah Tech1–146%
RCECompare →
9:00 PM ETProj. 77–73
297Montana St0–155%
265Idaho St0–145%
RCECompare →
9:00 PM ETProj. 71–79
307N Arizona0–119%
255E Washington0–181%
RCECompare →
9:00 PM ETProj. 73–75
141SE Missouri2–048%
342UT Martin0–152%
RCECompare →
9:00 PM ETProj. 75–76
280Liberty0–141%
154FIU1–059%
RCECompare →
9:30 PM ETProj. 76–76
195UC Riverside1–051%
Bakersfield0–049%
RCECompare →
10:00 PM ETProj. 73–75
239CA Baptist0–136%
238CSU Northridge0–164%
RCECompare →
10:00 PM ETProj. 72–74
211Utah Valley1–039%
196UC San Diego1–061%
RCECompare →
10:00 PM ETProj. 78–82
283Long Beach St0–131%
214Cal Poly1–069%
RCECompare →
10:00 PM ETProj. 69–81
215Sacramento St1–013%
194UC Irvine1–087%
RCECompare →
11:00 PM ETProj. 72–83
139San Francisco1–014%
4Santa Clara2–086%
RCECompare →

Small numbers beside teams are our rankings, not the AP poll. R, C and E show whether our rankings, common opponents and efficiency agree with the pick.